Lloyd's confusion over Tribunal act

Matthew Lloyd, a former Australian Rules Football (AFL) player and current commentator for Channel 7's coverage of the AFL, has expressed his view that the AFL should eliminate the use of character references in mitigating the suspensions handed down to players. This controversy stems from recent incidents where players have successfully used character references to reduce their suspensions, raising concerns about the fairness and consistency of the disciplinary process.

The AFL's disciplinary system is governed by the AFL Rules of the Game and the AFL Anti-Doping Code. When a player is charged with a rule violation, they may be suspended for a specified period depending on the severity of the offense. The AFL's Match Review Panel (MRP) is responsible for determining the appropriate sanction for each infringement.

Character references are statements from individuals who can vouch for a player's good conduct and personal attributes. These references are typically submitted by family members, friends, coaches, or community leaders. The MRP may consider character references as mitigating factors when determining the length of a suspension.

One high-profile case that has fueled the debate is the incident involving Essendon's Joe Daniher in 2019. Daniher was charged with striking an opponent during a game and was initially suspended for three matches. However, after submitting character references, his suspension was reduced to one match by the MRP. This decision sparked criticism from some quarters, with many arguing that character references should not be taken into account when determining suspensions.

The AFL Players Association (AFLPA) has defended the use of character references, stating that they provide context and insight into a player's personal circumstances and demonstrate their commitment to rehabilitation. However, critics argue that allowing character references to influence suspensions undermines the consistency and fairness of the disciplinary process, as each case is unique and should be judged solely on its merits.

The AFL has not yet indicated whether it intends to change its policy regarding character references and suspensions. However, the ongoing debate highlights the need for transparency and clarity in the disciplinary process and the potential for reforms that ensure fairness and consistency for all players.

In summary, Matthew Lloyd's call for the removal of character references in mitigating suspensions stems from concerns about fairness and consistency in the AFL's disciplinary process. Recent cases have shown that character references can significantly reduce suspensions, leading to criticism and calls for reform. The AFL has yet to announce any changes to its policy on this matter.