Lloyd's confusion over Tribunal act

Matthew Lloyd, a former Australian Rules Football (AFL) player and current commentator for Channel 7's coverage of the AFL, has expressed his view that the AFL should eliminate the use of character references in mitigating the suspensions handed down to players. This controversy stems from recent incidents where players have successfully appealed their suspensions by presenting compelling character references that have swayed the decision of the tribunal.

The AFL Tribunal is an independent body responsible for hearing and determining appeals against penalties imposed by match review officers for breaches of the AFL rules. The tribunal has the power to reduce or increase penalties based on various factors, including mitigating circumstances presented by both the player and their legal representation. Character references are often used to demonstrate a player's good conduct and remorse, which can influence the tribunal's decision.

One notable example of this occurred in 2020 when Essendon's Devon Smith was suspended for three matches for striking an opponent during a game. Smith's legal team presented several character references from high-profile figures in the community, including former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and Essendon legend James Hird. The tribunal ultimately reduced Smith's suspension to two matches, citing his "exemplary record" and "genuine remorse" as reasons for the reduction.

Another instance involved Geelong's Tom Hawkins, who was suspended for one match for striking an opponent in 2019. Hawkins' legal team presented character references from former players and community leaders, which led to the tribunal reducing his suspension to no games on the basis of his "impeccable record" and "genuine remorse."

Lloyd believes that allowing character references to influence suspensions creates an unfair advantage for players with high-profile connections and undermines the consistency of the disciplinary process. He argues that suspensions should be based solely on the severity of the offence and the player's previous disciplinary record, without consideration of external factors like character references.

The AFL has not yet responded publicly to Lloyd's comments, but this issue has sparked debate among fans and pundits about the fairness and transparency of the tribunal process. Some argue that character references can provide valuable context and insight into a player's personality and intentions, while others believe they introduce unnecessary bias and subjectivity into the decision-making process.

It is essential to note that this is an ongoing issue in the AFL community and that opinions on this matter may vary. The AFL and the tribunal will likely continue to review and consider the role of character references in mitigating suspensions as they strive for a fair and consistent disciplinary process.