Lloyd's confusion over Tribunal act

Matthew Lloyd, a former Australian Rules Football (AFL) player and current commentator for Channel 7's coverage of the AFL, has expressed his view that the AFL should eliminate the use of character references in mitigating the suspensions handed down to players. This controversy stems from recent incidents where players have successfully used character references to reduce their suspensions, raising concerns about the fairness and consistency of the disciplinary process.

The AFL's disciplinary system is governed by the AFL Rules of the Game and the AFL Anti-Doping Code. When a player breaches a rule, they may be charged with an offence and face a hearing before the AFL Tribunal. The Tribunal is responsible for determining the penalty for the offence, which can range from a fine to a suspension.

Character references are statements from individuals who can attest to a player's good character or remorse for their actions. These references are typically submitted by the player or their representatives during the disciplinary process and are taken into consideration by the Tribunal when determining the penalty. The rationale behind allowing character references is that they can provide insight into the player's background and demonstrate extenuating circumstances that may mitigate the severity of their actions.

However, there have been instances where players have received reduced suspensions due to compelling character references, which has led to criticism and calls for reform. For example, in 2019, Essendon player Michael Hurley was suspended for two matches for striking an opponent but had his suspension reduced to one match after submitting a heartfelt apology letter and character references from teammates and coaches.

Critics argue that this inconsistency undermines the deterrent effect of suspensions and creates an unfair advantage for players with strong support networks or those who can afford high-profile legal representation. Furthermore, some believe that allowing character references to influence penalties may lead to leniency towards players who commit serious offences and may send the wrong message about acceptable behaviour in the sport.

The AFL has acknowledged the controversy surrounding character references and has indicated that it will review the issue. However, no definitive decision has been made regarding whether or not they will be removed from the disciplinary process. The debate continues as stakeholders weigh the importance of considering mitigating circumstances against the need for consistency and fairness in the application of suspensions.

In summary, Matthew Lloyd's call for the removal of character references from the AFL disciplinary process stems from concerns about inconsistency and fairness in the application of suspensions. The use of character references has been a topic of controversy in recent years, with some arguing that they undermine the deterrent effect of suspensions and create an unfair advantage for certain players. The AFL is currently reviewing the issue and has not yet made a decision regarding whether or not they will be removed from the disciplinary process.