Lloyd's confusion over Tribunal act

Matthew Lloyd, a former Australian Rules Football (AFL) player and current commentator for Channel 7's coverage of the AFL, has expressed his view that the AFL should eliminate the use of character references in mitigating the suspensions handed down to players. This controversy stems from recent incidents where players have successfully appealed their suspensions by presenting compelling character references that have swayed the decision of the tribunal.

The AFL Tribunal is an independent body responsible for hearing and determining appeals against decisions made by match review officers regarding on-field misconduct by players. The tribunal has the power to reduce suspensions based on mitigating circumstances presented during the appeal process. Character references are one of the pieces of evidence that can be presented to the tribunal in mitigation of a player's actions.

One of the most recent high-profile cases involving the use of character references was the appeal by Essendon's Devon Smith in 2019. Smith was originally suspended for five matches for striking an opponent during a game. However, during his appeal hearing, Smith presented several character references from high-profile figures in the community, including former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and Essendon legend James Hird. The tribunal ultimately reduced Smith's suspension to three matches, citing his remorse and the positive impact he has had on the community as reasons for the reduction.

Another example is the appeal by Geelong's Mitch Duncan in 2018. Duncan was originally suspended for two matches for striking an opponent but was successful in having his suspension reduced to one match after presenting character references from teammates and coaches.

Critics argue that the use of character references in the tribunal process is unfair and inconsistent, as it can lead to different outcomes for similar offenses based on the quality and quantity of character references presented. Some believe that this undermines the consistency and fairness of the disciplinary process and creates an unfair advantage for players from high-profile clubs or those with strong support networks.

The AFL has not yet indicated any intention to change the rules regarding the use of character references in tribunal hearings. However, the ongoing debate surrounding this issue highlights the need for transparency and consistency in the disciplinary process and raises questions about whether the current system is serving the best interests of the game.

In summary, Matthew Lloyd's call for the removal of the ability to use character references in mitigating suspensions is a response to recent cases where players have successfully appealed their suspensions by presenting compelling character references that have swayed the decision of the tribunal. Critics argue that this creates an unfair advantage for some players and undermines the consistency and fairness of the disciplinary process. The AFL has not yet indicated any intention to change the rules regarding character references in tribunal hearings.